This
review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained
therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to
copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions.
Crossposted at WordPress, Blogspot & Librarything by Bookstooge’s
Exalted Permission
Title: Decadence
Series: A
Very Short Introduction
Author: David Weir
Rating:
1.5 of 5 Stars
Genre: Non-Fiction
Pages:
142
Words: 44K
From the Publisher
The
history of decadent culture runs from ancient Rome to
nineteenth-century Paris, Victorian London, fin de siècle Vienna,
Weimar Berlin, and beyond. The decline of Rome provides the pattern
for both aesthetic and social decadence, a pattern that artists and
writers in the nineteenth century imitated, emulated, parodied, and
otherwise manipulated for aesthetic gain. What begins as the moral
condemnation of modernity in mid-nineteenth century France on the
part of decadent authors such as Charles Baudelaire ends up as the
perverse celebration of the pessimism that accompanies imperial
decline. This delight in decline informs the rich canon of decadence
that runs from Joris-Karl Huysmans's À Rebours to Oscar Wilde's The
Picture of Dorian Gray, Aubrey Beardsley's drawings, Gustav Klimt's
paintings, and numerous other works. In this Very Short Introduction,
David Weir explores the conflicting attitudes towards modernity
present in decadent culture by examining the difference between
aesthetic decadence--the excess of artifice--and social decadence,
which involves excess in a variety of forms, whether perversely
pleasurable or gratuitously cruel. Such contrariness between
aesthetic and social decadence led some of its practitioners to
substitute art for life and to stress the importance of taste over
morality, a maneuver with far-reaching consequences, especially as
decadence enters the realm of popular culture today.
I was talking with a friend of mine about higher education and we
ended up discussing how it seems that those who are the most informed
on a subject are often the worst at actually conveying information
about said subject. Which led me to talk about this series and that
lead to some interesting info for me.
Zac, my friend (and no, he's not just in my head), was saying that a
lot of higher education is about finding the right books on a subject
tangential to the one you're actually studying. So an Introductory
book like this is meant for someone who is already experienced in
some aspect of the subject and wants a bibliography to expand their
knowledge. It went a LONG way towards explaining my issues with this
series. It's not an Introduction for the Layperson, but an
Introduction for People Already into the Subject. While it doesn't
solve my problems with the series, it radically adjusts my
perspective and that will help alleviate some of the frustration
caused by idiots who aren't idiots but are idiots. With that out of
the way, let's proceed.
I was hoping the author would take a factual look at Decadence and
keep his opinions to himself. In fact, I wasn't just hoping that, I
was expecting that. Instead, I am treated to an author glorifying and
almost wallowing in the perverse and disgusting. The author doesn't
appear to just be interested in the subject of Decadence itself but
to have dived into the very essence of Decadence and come out
praising it. Metaphorically, he doesn't just talk about pig poop but
he dives in and then proceeds to throw it at the reader while
shouting how wonderful, how liberating, how brave anyone is who can
swim in pig poop.
I'm adding a couple of quotes now.
“ But above all perverse, almost everything perverse interests,
fascinates me.”
~chapter 3
“those decadents and degenerates of the 1920s now appear almost
heroic in their hedonism”
~chapter 4
“but such attraction to degradation is by no means a criticism”
~Afterwords
Now, none of those are in context and many are not the authors words
but quotes he is using to support his own ideas. However, the context
IS clear that he supports each and every statement. It made me sick.
To end, this book made me sick and I'm sorry that I read it. Talking
about a subject is far different from praising a subject :-(
★✬☆☆☆