Showing posts with label Isaac Asimov. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Isaac Asimov. Show all posts

Sunday, September 13, 2026

I, Asimov (Asimovian Memoirs #3) 5Stars

 

This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission

Title: I, Asimov
Series: Asimovian Memoirs #3
Authors: Isaac Asimov
Rating: 5 of 5 Stars
Genre: Autobiography
Pages: 914
Words: 214K
Publish: 1994


The previous two Asimovian Memoirs (In Memory Yet Green and In Joy Still Felt) were very dense, factually heavy books. They were interesting but slow going and strictly chronological. I, Asimov repeats a lot of the data from those two books but brings us up to date to his illness in the 90’s and a final chapter by his second wife Janet, brings things to a close post-mortem.

This was a much lighter book, in tone. It’s not the bare facts of the matter, but as much about how Asimov felt about the subject he was writing about as about the subject itself. Much more of a “memoir” than a straight up autobiography. As such, I am very glad to have read the previous two books ahead of this, as it gave me a much deeper laid foundation to put this book on.

In that regards, I never felt bored by the repeating of data I had already read, because it was written in a different manner and with a different goal in mind. Asimov doesn’t go nearly as deep on subjects so there’s no “cut and paste” feel, which is important. He also talks about things from a more human perspective (how it made him feel) instead of just the facts. He had a section on his son David which opened up a little bit more about why he hadn’t written very much about him in the previous books. He also talks a bit more candidly about his first wife and the divorce. Nothing salacious or mean spirited, but being honest about their incompatibilities and inherent character flaws in both of them that they couldn’t or wouldn’t overcome.

Because this wasn’t strictly chronological, but topical, you can’t just skip sections thinking you’ve already know all the info from the previous two books. Some things yes, were no different but many of the areas were expanded upon post-1975, so there’s a good 15 years of new thoughts and happenings, even about people and events from his past. He talks about the Foundation novels and the Robot novels that happened post-1975 and it was fascinating to get his thoughts on them, to the point where I am seriously considering reading the rest of the Foundation books even though when I read them in the 90’s I wasn’t a fan.

This book really brings out the fact that Asimov was a short story guy. Whether fiction or non-fiction, he excelled at the under-10,000 word format. He could churn out articles for papers and magazines week after week without breaking a sweat. It isn’t until he talks about the novels that it becomes evident how hard it was for him to write when he wasn’t enjoying the process of writing.

From this, and the previous books, it is evident that Asimov had a huge ego. He parades around the issue and paints it in a positive light as promoting himself because no one else would, and while that was true to some extent, you can tell that he thought he was the best, period. It comes more to light in how he interacts with others and glimpses get through his writing. One of the issues was his atheism. He writes a chapter or two about religion and from that you can tell he doesn’t just disagree with anyone who believes in the supernatural, but that he despised them, for a variety of reasons. It was also evident that he simply didn’t understand the Bible as a whole but chose bits and bobs to talk about and skewered them that way. That stood out to me because he claimed throughout the book to be such an intellectual and that he was always judging things fairly and rationally. It just wasn’t so.

I really enjoyed this memoir and felt like it was a great capstone to the trilogy. The first two books dug a deep foundation and this put up the house and all the pretty windows. While I would recommend this book as a standalone, I would really recommend people read the whole Asimovian Memoirs trilogy to get the full experience.

★★★★★


From Asimov.fandom.com

It's a series of personal essays rather than a strictly chronological narrative, covering a wide range of topics from his childhood to his literary career and personal life. The book explores his thoughts on science, society, his colleagues, and even religion, offering a glimpse into the mind of a prolific writer.



Tuesday, August 04, 2026

In Joy Still Felt (1954-1978) (Asimovian Memoirs #2) 4Stars

 

This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission

Title: In Joy Still Felt (1954-1978)
Series: Asimovian Memoirs #2
Authors: Isaac Asimov
Rating: 4 of 5 Stars
Genre: Autobiography
Pages: 778
Words: 307K
Publish: 1980


Reading this went much smoother than the previous book, “In Memory Yet Green”. Part of that was that it was getting into the stuff I wanted to actually read about, his breaking out into a successful SF author and his growing fame as an author in general. I kept waiting to hit that wall like I had in the first book, where I had to take a break, and it never came. I sailed through this like a space shark scenting space blood, in space ;-) It felt really good to be honest.

The downside was that as he became more famous, his ego came more to the forefront and there were several instances that he records where all I could think was “this whole situation came about because of your monstrous ego”. He still keeps things light, but he wasn’t just the aggrieved party in several instances.

There was obviously something up with his son David, that he doesn’t talk about. David had to go to private schools to finish high school, took 5 years to do so and Asimov states something like “and it was obvious college was out for him”. Asimov just doesn’t interact with his son as he becomes an adult and doesn’t write about him. I really wouldn’t have noticed it (and assumed it was for privacy’s sake) except he writes a LOT about his second child, his daughter. She gets all sorts of stories told and he interacts with her like you’d assume a father would. Then there’s his first wife Gertrude who Asimov ended up divorcing. Even in the first book, and more so here, she’s very much a non-entity in his life. I don’t know if she played that small a role in his life or if he just didn’t want to write about her. Either way, it felt very weird to not-read about his wife and son, especially with the example of his daughter. And when he remarries, he has all sorts of things to say about his second wife, so I suspect he was trying to practice the “if you don’t have anything nice to say….” routine. But man, it was quite noticeable.

Asimov was an extremely personable man and it showed in how he could handle speaking engagements, almost off the cuff. That ability comes through in his writing and made for a good time. While I didn’t agree with a lot of stuff he did, or believed, it never impacted how he wrote. He was a very liberal man, politically and morally and I believe he would have fit right into the WOKE crowd or the ME TOO group. How he wrote about Richard Nixon (literally calling him Hitler) reminded me of how neo-liberals of today feel about Trump. And their game book hasn’t changed a bit. Act outraged about something, call others super nasty names and take the moral high ground on an issue that nobody is arguing about. It made laugh to see this carried out 50 years earlier, hahahaha :-)

There is one more book in this “Asimovian Memoirs” trilogy, that was a compilation of these two books and some new stuff and some posthumous stuff by his wife Janet. While I’m not looking forward to going over some of the same ground as I’ve already trod, I think the new stuff will be worth it.

★★★★☆


From Grokipedia.com

Relation to Asimov's autobiographies

In Joy Still Felt: The Autobiography of Isaac Asimov, 1954-1978 constitutes the second volume of Asimov's detailed autobiographical project, directly following In Memory Yet Green: The Autobiography, 1920-1954, which documented his early life and career up to 1954. [1] This volume extends the chronological narrative to cover the period from 1954 to 1978, preserving the exhaustive, day-by-day style characteristic of the initial installment. [2] The titles of both In Memory Yet Green and In Joy Still Felt derive from the same poetic lines—"In memory yet green, in joy still felt, / The scenes of life rise sharply into view"—which Asimov featured prominently in the volumes. [3]Combined, the two volumes total approximately 640,000 words, reflecting Asimov's commitment to a highly comprehensive and uncondensed recounting of his life. [4] In contrast, Asimov's later I. Asimov: A Memoir (1994) presents a more condensed overview of his entire life, departing from strict chronological detail in favor of a structure organized around thematic and emotional elements. [5]A further abridged selection drawn from his autobiographical material appeared in 2002 as It's Been a Good Life.

Context of the covered period

The period from 1954 to 1978 represented a pivotal transformation in Isaac Asimov's career, as he transitioned from balancing academic responsibilities with writing to dedicating himself exclusively to authorship. In the mid-1950s, Asimov continued his role as associate professor of biochemistry at Boston University School of Medicine, having joined the faculty in 1949 and been promoted to associate professor in 1955. [6] This academic phase overlapped with his ongoing science fiction output, but in 1958 he ceased active teaching duties and salary (effective June 30, 1958) amid university concerns over his lack of research, becoming a full-time writer while retaining his university title after negotiations. [2] [6]The shift to full-time writing was accelerated by the 1957 launch of Sputnik, which spurred Asimov to address perceived deficiencies in American science education through accessible nonfiction. [7] Beginning in November 1958, he launched a monthly science essay column in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction that continued uninterrupted for 399 issues, earning him a special Hugo Award in 1963 for bridging science and science fiction. [2] This period saw an extraordinary expansion of his popular science nonfiction, encompassing books on a wide array of scientific subjects alongside works on literature, history, and other topics, establishing him as one of the era's most prolific and influential popularizers of knowledge. [2]Asimov further diversified his output to include mystery stories, literary and biblical guides, and humorous pieces, reflecting his versatility beyond traditional science fiction and science exposition. [2] Concurrently, science fiction achieved greater cultural respectability during the 1950s through 1970s, aided by broader societal interest in science amid the space age and Asimov's own growing public prominence as a writer, speaker, and commentator who made complex ideas approachable to general audiences. [2] His intermittent but influential presence in the field, combined with his extensive nonfiction contributions, helped elevate science fiction's status and cemented his reputation as a central figure in its mainstream acceptance. [2]

Development and writing process

Isaac Asimov composed In Joy Still Felt by culling material from his extensive personal diaries, which provided the chronological structure and precise factual details for the period from 1954 to 1978. [8] These diaries served as the primary source for documenting events, dates, and daily occurrences, enabling a highly accurate and methodical reconstruction of his life during those years. Asimov's exceptional memory supplemented the diaries by allowing him to recall vivid conversations, emotions, and incidental details that added depth to the narrative.The writing process reflected Asimov's disciplined and prolific habits, resulting in a lengthy, detailed manuscript focused on factual precision over interpretive embellishment. In the autobiography, Asimov adopted a candid and self-aware tone, cheerfully recounting his professional successes and personal achievements while openly admitting his faults, stupidities, moments of vanity, and failures. [9] He balanced self-appreciation with frank admissions of shortcomings and errors in judgment, creating an engaging portrayal of both accomplishment and human imperfection. [9]Janet Asimov later critiqued the two original autobiographical volumes as too factual and reserved, describing them as overly chronological and emotionally restrained. [10] This observation, made in connection with the preparation of the subsequent memoir I. Asimov, highlighted her view that the earlier works prioritized detail and sequence at the expense of deeper emotional expression.

Content

Structure and organization

In Joy Still Felt is divided into five chronological parts, which together contain forty-six chapters. [9] [11] The book extends to 828 pages in its original edition and follows a detailed, sequential narrative that traces Asimov's life and work from 1954 onward. [12] [13] Within each chapter, the text breaks into numerous short sections, often presented as brief anecdotes or focused accounts of particular incidents, creating a fragmented yet densely packed progression that mirrors the author's meticulous record-keeping. [9] [14] This format emphasizes discrete events over extended thematic discussions, resulting in a diary-like chronicle of daily and professional developments. [9]The main body of the narrative concludes on December 31, 1977, after which a short updating section brings select details forward to 1979. [9] This organization supports a rigorous chronological framework while accommodating the inclusion of photographs, appendices, and indexes. [13]

Professional milestones

In "In Joy Still Felt," Asimov describes the opening of the covered period as coinciding with his ongoing role as a biochemistry professor at Boston University School of Medicine, where he encountered administrative disapproval for producing nonfiction books during what superiors considered academic time. [15] This tension escalated into a significant conflict, leading him to relinquish salaried teaching responsibilities in the late 1950s while retaining his faculty title as a nonsalaried associate professor, a change that freed him to pursue writing full-time. [11] [9] The autobiography later notes his eventual promotion to full professor, along with honorary degrees and Boston University's archival collection of his works. [9]Asimov recounts his fiction output during these years, beginning with the 1954 publication of The Caves of Steel, a key novel blending science fiction and mystery. [11] Notable later works include the 1966 novelization Fantastic Voyage, written to accompany the film, and The Gods Themselves (1972), which earned both the Hugo and Nebula Awards for best novel. [9] He also expanded into mystery fiction during the 1970s, alongside specialized nonfiction such as guides to the Bible and Shakespeare, and collections of original limericks. [9]The book emphasizes Asimov's rapid growth in nonfiction writing across science, history, and other fields, culminating in the celebration of his 200th published book near the end of the period, marked by Opus 200 and the first volume of his autobiography. [9] [15] This prolific output reflected a shift toward popular science exposition and away from heavy science fiction production. [9]Asimov chronicles his rising public profile, including the 1977 founding of Isaac Asimov’s Science Fiction Magazine, which extended his influence in the genre. [9] He also details the growth of his career as a sought-after speaker and television commentator, with increasing fees and engagements that solidified his status as a prominent explainer of science. [9]

Personal life events

In "In Joy Still Felt", Asimov recounts the birth of his daughter Robyn Joan in 1955, joining her older brother David in the family he shared with his first wife Gertrude. [16] The autobiography touches on family life during this period, though it focuses more on later developments. [16]The deaths of his parents marked significant personal losses: his father Judah died in 1969, followed by his mother Anna in 1973. [16] Asimov describes bidding farewell to his father in a dedicated chapter. [13]After separating from Gertrude in 1970, Asimov finalized his divorce on November 16, 1973, ending a marriage that had lasted 31 years. [16] He married Janet Jeppson two weeks later on November 30, 1973, and the autobiography includes a chapter on this second marriage. [16] [13]Asimov details his health challenges, including a thyroid condition addressed in the chapter "My Thyroid," which contemporary reviews describe as thyroid cancer. [13] [17] In 1977 he suffered a heart attack, covered in the chapter "Coronary" along with his recovery. [13]Due to severe acrophobia that limited his air travel to only two flights in his lifetime, Asimov preferred ocean cruises for longer journeys and describes several such trips during the 1970s, including one eclipse cruise taken alone. [16] [13] These personal changes, including his remarriage, contributed to greater flexibility in his later years. [16]

Interactions and anecdotes

In Joy Still Felt is filled with Asimov's recollections of his encounters with a wide range of figures in science fiction and popular culture, offering a glimpse into the social dynamics of the genre during the period. He describes his long-standing friendships with Arthur C. Clarke and Robert A. Heinlein, including their mutual admiration, playful rivalries, and occasional disagreements on topics like politics and writing styles. Asimov recounts humorous exchanges with Clarke, such as their informal agreement on how to handle compliments about each other's work, and notes moments of tension and reconciliation with Heinlein amid their differing views.Anecdotes about Harlan Ellison highlight Ellison's volatile personality, including pranks, heated arguments at conventions, and eventual amicable resolutions. Asimov also shares stories involving Larry Niven and Robert Silverberg, often centered on convention appearances and casual discussions of ideas. His relationship with editors Lester del Rey and Judy-Lynn del Rey is portrayed through social gatherings, professional advice, and light-hearted banter.Asimov includes encounters with figures outside science fiction, such as astronomer Carl Sagan, with whom he discussed popular science and shared mutual respect, as well as brief meetings with actresses Raquel Welch and Julie Newmar at public events or conventions. Throughout these accounts, he intersperses self-deprecating humor about his own ego, such as his tendency to dominate conversations, his love of attention at gatherings, and his habit of reciting limericks or puns to entertain or deflect. These candid reflections underscore his awareness of his foibles while portraying the lively, sometimes contentious world of fandom and professional science fiction circles.



Wednesday, June 03, 2026

In Memory Yet Green (1920-1954) (Asimovian Memoirs #1) 4Stars

 

This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission

Title: In Memory Yet Green (1920-1954)
Series: Asimovian Memoirs #1
Authors: Isaac Asimov
Rating: 4 of 5 Stars
Genre: Autobiography
Pages: 663
Words: 300K
Publish: 1979


The synopsis/whatever provided by Grokipedia is very long. However, it was not nearly as long as this book and I will say that a little Asimov goes a long way.

This is an autobiography and while I had added the “memoir” tag, Asimov does make it clear that he used his own journals as primary documents and he also used many of his contracts with various magazines and publishers to date stories, etc. Which leaves me feeling pretty comfortable that what is being told here is a step up from a pure memoir. However, and this is a big however, Asimov’s style makes it extremely clear that he is up-selling his positive traits and down playing the negative ones. He doesn’t ignore the bad stuff, but it is almost like he’s writing about them while squinting, so it’s all hazy and unclear.

I was ready for this to be over at the 400 page mark. The level of detail is what I would expect from a chronic journaller and might make historians all gushy, but for someone like me, it was just a flow of minutiae that overwhelmed me. The level of personal detail is why I decided to add the memoir tag. Plus, near the beginning he claims to have a “near-eidetic” memory but later in the book acknowledges he has no memory of certain events or people and that without his journal, they would have disappeared from his mind. So he remembers what he remembers very well, but what he doesn’t remember, he doesn’t remember not remembering. If that makes sense? Which means anything from his memory is suspect, which is what memoirs are all about.

I actually took a break from reading this after the 400page mark and read a couple of other things, just to give myself some breathing room. I actually read The Black Colossus, Edgar and Emma and The White Rose. A novella, a short story and a novel and it was barely enough.

Don’t get me wrong, Asimov wrote smoothly, with a funny and very witty style and he was never a bore or pompous. But just like anyone who finds a track of success, sometimes they overuse that “joke” and by the third time it’s just embarrassing to listen to them instead of being uproariously funny like the first time. Like I said, I’d reached my limit by 400 pages and the book was just under 700.

I am pretty much done my reading of Asimov’s fiction, which is why I chose to dive into this trilogy about the author as a man. That usually doesn’t work out so well for me and this was about what I expected. Asimov was a lech and very handsy (even by 1940’s and 1950’s standards) and I am surprised that he wasn’t beaten up. I know I would probably have threatened to blow his brains out. He was also an adulterer and philanderer and didn’t try to hide that in this volume. He does downplay it and there is nothing salacious, but it is clear he would take just about anything offered by any woman he found attractive.

I learned a lot about his growing up years and his breaking into the literary world and I’m glad I did. I also made up the “series” title because there is this volume and then the next, which covers up to 1978 and then there was a posthumous volume entitled “I, Asimov”, all of which comprise an autobiography but assembled at various times and by various people (Asimov died in 1992 I believe).

The title of this volume, and the next volume (In Joy Still Felt), are taken from an anonymous poem that Asimov included at the beginning of the book. Here it is:
In memory yet green, in joy still felt,
The scenes of life rise sharply into view.
We triumph, Time's disasters are undealt,
And while all else is old, the world is new.

I will not try to psychoanalyze that at all. You are more than welcome too if you so desire.

★★★★☆


From Grokipedia.com

In Memory Yet Green: The Autobiography, 1920-1954 is the first volume of Isaac Asimov's autobiography, published in 1979 by Doubleday & Company, Inc. [1] [2] It chronicles the author's life and career from his birth in 1920 through 1954, marking the period of his early years, immigration to the United States, education, and emergence as a writer in science fiction and science popularization. [3] The book is notable as Asimov's two-hundredth published work, in which he applies his characteristic candid and engaging style to recounting his own experiences in science, science fiction, and related pursuits. [4]The autobiography serves as a detailed personal account from one of the most prolific authors of the 20th century, whose output spanned multiple genres and disciplines. [4] A companion second volume, In Joy Still Felt, continues the narrative from 1954 onward. [5] The work provides insight into Asimov's development as a writer during a formative era of his professional life. [3]

Background

Isaac Asimov

Isaac Asimov was born on January 2, 1920, in Petrovichi, Russia, and emigrated to the United States with his family, arriving in New York City on February 3, 1923, at the age of three.[6] He grew up in Brooklyn and pursued his education at Columbia University, where he earned a B.S. in chemistry in 1939, an M.A. in 1941, and a Ph.D. in 1948.[6] Asimov joined the Boston University School of Medicine faculty in 1949 as an instructor in biochemistry, advancing to assistant professor in 1951, associate professor in 1955, and ultimately full professor in 1979, though he relinquished active teaching duties in 1958 to focus on writing while retaining his title.[6]Asimov established himself as a prolific author and science popularizer, producing works across science fiction, popular science, mystery, and other fields.[7] Widely regarded as one of the most prolific writers in history, he authored or edited hundreds of books over his career.[6] In 1979, In Memory Yet Green was published as his 200th book, coinciding with Opus 200, a collection highlighting his first two hundred titles.[6] His major science fiction contributions, including the Foundation series and the landmark short story "Nightfall," had already earned him enduring acclaim in the genre by the time he undertook his autobiography.[6] In Memory Yet Green itself covers Asimov's life from 1920 to 1954; he transitioned to full-time writing in 1958.[6]

Writing and purpose

Asimov composed In Memory Yet Green during the late 1970s, when he had achieved extraordinary productivity and renown, marking the book itself as his 200th published work.[8] This timing allowed the autobiography to serve as a reflective self-portrait, capturing his ascent from a child of Russian immigrants to a leading figure in science fiction and popular science writing.[9]His motivation stemmed in large part from a lifelong compulsive work ethic, rooted in his father's frequent criticisms labeling him a "fulyack" (Yiddish for sluggard), which instilled a deep-seated fear of idleness and drove him to maintain relentless output across decades.[8] By documenting his early life and career in exhaustive detail, Asimov sought to chronicle this transformation and affirm his accomplishments against that early judgment.[8]To ensure precision and depth, he relied on the diaries he had kept compulsively since youth, chronicling minutiae such as birthdays, acquisitions of typewriters or telephones, and daily events.[9] These records enabled the autobiography's remarkable factual accuracy and granular reconstruction of his experiences.[9]

Publication history

Original publication

In Memory Yet Green: The Autobiography, 1920-1954 was first published on February 9, 1979, by Doubleday & Company, Inc. in Garden City, New York.[10] This initial hardcover edition contained ix + 732 pages (with additional plates), bore the ISBN 0-385-13679-X, and retailed for $15.95.[10] The book marked a notable publishing event as one of two volumes—alongside the Houghton Mifflin anthology Opus 200—promoted as Isaac Asimov's 200th book, celebrating his prolific career across science fiction, popular science, and other genres.[11] This milestone designation underscored the release's significance for Asimov's wide audience, who followed his extensive output with enthusiasm.[12] The Doubleday edition, issued as the first volume of Asimov's autobiography, represented a major hardcover release tailored to his established readership.[13]

Editions and reprints

Following the original 1979 hardcover publication by Doubleday, In Memory Yet Green was reprinted as a trade paperback by Avon Books in 1980. [10] This edition, with ISBN 978-0380754328, retained the complete original text across 732 pages and was presented as the first volume of Isaac Asimov's autobiography. [2] The sequel, In Joy Still Felt: The Autobiography of Isaac Asimov, 1954-1978, appeared the same year, forming a two-volume continuation of his life story. [14] The Avon paperback remains available through used book markets and online sellers. [15]

Content summary

Early childhood and immigration

In "In Memory Yet Green", Asimov recounts his birth on January 2, 1920, in Petrovichi, a small town in the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (now in Russia), to Jewish parents Judah Asimov and Anna Rachel Berman Asimov. [6] Facing difficult conditions in post-revolutionary Russia, including economic hardship and political uncertainty, the family decided to emigrate to the United States for better opportunities. [6] [16] They departed the Soviet Union on January 11, 1923, and arrived in New York City on February 3, 1923, when Asimov was three years old. [6]The family settled in the East New York section of Brooklyn at 425 Van Siclen Avenue, where they began their new life as Russian-speaking Jewish immigrants. [6] Judah Asimov, initially penniless and unable to speak or read English, worked various jobs before saving enough to open a candy store, which became the family's home and primary source of income. [17] [16] The store operated long hours, often from early morning to late at night, reflecting the demanding work ethic of immigrant life in Brooklyn. [17]As a young child in a non-English-speaking household, Asimov initially struggled with the new language. [17] Before the age of five, however, he taught himself to read by carefully deciphering shop signs and street signs around Brooklyn, driven by intense curiosity and determination to understand his surroundings. [17] These early efforts at self-education amid the challenges of immigration are presented in the autobiography as foundational to his later intellectual development. [17]

School years and self-education

Asimov portrays his school years as those of a child prodigy who advanced quickly through the educational system. [3] He skipped several grades in elementary school and earned A's in nearly every subject, receiving only lower marks in deportment. [9] [18]His early introduction to fiction came through a friendship with a talkative classmate who mesmerized him with invented stories, marking his first meaningful encounter with narrative literature. [18] [3] This experience fueled his growing passion for reading, which he pursued independently by secretly borrowing science fiction pulp magazines from the display rack in his father's candy store. [18] He read them in hiding and carefully returned them to appear untouched, allowing him to explore the genre without parental knowledge. [4]

College and graduate studies

In Memory Yet Green recounts Isaac Asimov's accelerated entry into higher education, beginning in 1935 at the age of fifteen after graduating from high school.[19] He initially enrolled at City College of New York for a few days before switching to Seth Low Junior College, the Brooklyn campus of Columbia University, where he received a $100 scholarship.[19] The book describes his disappointment at not gaining direct admission to the more prestigious Columbia College proper, instead starting at the less elite Seth Low branch, which served commuter students and had a predominantly Jewish and Italian student body.[4][20]Seth Low Junior College closed after Asimov's freshman year in 1936, prompting his transfer to Columbia University's main Morningside Heights campus.[19] There, he pursued chemistry as his major, completing his Bachelor of Science degree in 1939 at age nineteen.[19] The autobiography details his persistence in graduate studies despite obstacles, including initial rejection from Columbia's master's program in chemistry after being turned down by medical schools; he successfully argued for probationary admission, which was lifted after one year, resulting in his Master of Arts degree in 1941.[19]Asimov continued directly into Columbia's doctoral program in chemistry, though his research faced significant interruption from 1942 to 1946 due to overlapping wartime commitments.[19] He completed his PhD in chemistry in May 1948, marking the culmination of his formal academic training in the field.[19] The book covers these experiences across roughly pages 139–165, emphasizing his rapid progression, financial strains, admissions challenges, and the intellectual rigor of his chemistry studies at Columbia.[20]

World War II and military service

During World War II, Asimov describes being recruited to work as a civilian chemist at the Naval Air Experimental Station in Philadelphia (commonly known as the Philadelphia Navy Yard) starting in May 1942, following a recommendation from fellow science fiction writer Robert A. Heinlein, who was already employed there. [21] [19] His duties primarily involved routine laboratory testing of materials used in naval aircraft, such as soaps, cleaners, seam sealers, plastics, and other substances, to ensure they met specifications for quality and performance. [21] As an example, he details testing waterproofness by placing calcium chloride in aluminum pans, covering them with the material under examination, sealing the edges with wax, weighing them before and after exposure to humidity for twenty-four hours, and measuring any weight gain due to water absorption. [21] Asimov reflects that his contributions were limited and routine, expressing the belief that in peacetime he would have been considered incompetent and dismissed for failing to innovate or advance beyond basic compliance testing. [21] He also notes learning to write technical specifications in the deliberately complex "Navy style" and once submitted a deliberately satirical version as an experiment, only to have it praised as exemplary by superiors. [22]Despite the war's conclusion in Europe and the Pacific, Asimov recounts persistent anxiety over potential conscription and his efforts to avoid induction through legal deferments. [22] He was eventually drafted and inducted into the U.S. Army on November 1, 1945. [22] [19] After initial processing at Fort Meade, Maryland, he was assigned to Camp Lee, Virginia, where—despite classification as a "critically needed specialist" in chemistry—he and other technically trained personnel were relegated to clerical and typing duties. [22] Later transferred to Oahu, Hawaii, Asimov narrowly escaped assignment to observe the Operation Crossroads atomic bomb tests at Bikini Atoll due to a clerical error that mistakenly recorded him as discharged and halted family allotment payments; he leveraged this administrative mistake to secure a return to the mainland for correction. [22] The issue was resolved in his favor, resulting in an honorable discharge on July 26, 1946, at the rank of corporal after nine months of service. [22]Asimov characterizes much of his military experience as absurd and Kafkaesque, particularly the misallocation of skilled personnel and the continuation of the draft after victory. [22] He relates two rare episodes of intoxication among his anecdotes: on one occasion, after becoming drunk, he professed love to a fellow soldier named Stash, who reacted defensively by preparing to fight off an embrace, after which Asimov giggled through the night and reflected that it was the only truly happy day he had in the Army, musing that such episodes explain why people drink; on another, he soothed a hiccuping, affectionate drunken bunkmate named Upton by reciting a humorous poem about the exaggerated love between drunken men, after which Upton vomited and fell asleep. [22]

Postwar academic career

In In Memory Yet Green, Asimov describes resuming his professional life after the war by joining the biochemistry department at Boston University School of Medicine in 1949 as an instructor, where he taught classes and conducted some research on nucleic acids and paper chromatography with the goal of studying cancer tissue, though he later reflected that this line of inquiry would not have produced meaningful results. [23] He particularly enjoyed lecturing and received standing ovations from his classes at the medical school, while he also began delivering popular science talks beyond the university. [18] [23] After struggling with administrative hurdles for raises and promotions, he advanced to Assistant Professor of Biochemistry at the end of 1951. [23] Although he liked lecturing and had no objection to grading objective-answer questions, Asimov expressed strong distaste for grading essay questions, performing laboratory research, and authoring scientific papers or textbooks. [23]The autobiography covers elements of his personal life during this period, including his marriage to his first wife, Gertrude. [4] The couple moved several times, first to a hot converted attic apartment, then to a more comfortable apartment, and finally to their first house. [23] After nine years of marriage and having abandoned hopes of having children, Gertrude gave birth to their son David shortly after Asimov experienced kidney stones, an event that led him to obtain life insurance and prepare a will. [23] [19] During these years, he learned to drive and purchased a Plymouth automobile to ease his commute. [23]Asimov also recounts his gradual transition toward full-time writing, noting that his writing income rose sharply and eventually surpassed his university salary, prompting him to regard writing as his primary vocation and his academic role as secondary. [23] His growing success in science fiction, addressed in the section on his rise in the field, supported this shift. The book concludes with the initial stages of disputes over his university position. [18]

Rise in science fiction

In Memory Yet Green details Asimov's entry into professional science fiction writing in 1938, when he began submitting short stories to pulp magazines while still a teenager, receiving numerous rejections before his persistence paid off with his first acceptance. His first published story, "Marooned off Vesta," appeared in Amazing Stories in October 1939 after being sold to editor Raymond A. Palmer. Asimov describes his early involvement with the Futurians, a New York-based fan group that included aspiring writers and future editors such as Frederik Pohl and Donald A. Wollheim, providing him with encouragement and contacts in the field even as he remained somewhat on the periphery due to his heavy focus on writing and studies.A key turning point came in his relationship with John W. Campbell, the editor of Astounding Science-Fiction, whom Asimov first met in 1938. Campbell rejected Asimov's early submissions but offered detailed feedback and encouragement, eventually publishing his stories starting in 1940 and becoming a major influence on his career. In 1941, Campbell supplied the premise for "Nightfall," a story about a planet with six suns experiencing darkness for the first time, which Asimov wrote quickly and which appeared in Astounding to significant acclaim within the genre. Asimov recounts the story's rapid composition and its status as one of his most successful early works, helping solidify his reputation among readers and editors.The autobiography further describes the inception of the Foundation series in 1942, when Campbell suggested the idea of a science of psychohistory to predict the future of a galactic empire, inspired by Gibbon's history of Rome; Asimov began the series with the novelette "Foundation," published in Astounding that year, followed by sequels that appeared over the next decade. He notes the magazine's payment rates of around one to two cents per word, which provided supplemental income alongside his academic position, though the economics of pulp publishing required prolific output to sustain a career. By 1954, Asimov had produced dozens of stories, established the Foundation narrative as a major work, and transitioned toward book publication with early novels such as Pebble in the Sky (1950) and the collected Foundation trilogy (1951–1953), marking his rise to prominence as one of the field's leading authors.



Wednesday, April 01, 2026

The Return of the Black Widowers (The Black Widowers #6) 3Stars

 

This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission


Title: The Return of the Black Widowers
Series: The Black Widowers #6
Authors: Isaac Asimov
Rating: 3 of 5 Stars
Genre: Mystery
Pages: 270
Words: 108K
Publish: 2003


This is the final, posthumous volume of the Black Widowers stories. When I started, I was under the impression it was all reprints with a new intro and some blathering by other authors. I was quite glad to find several new stories AND a new Black Widower inspired story by another author.

The intro by Harlan Ellison was a complete failure in my opinion. I’ve never read Ellison and after this intro, I never plan to. I don’t like the man’s humor, his writing style nor how he manages his words. He was supposed to be praising Asimov and maybe in his own way, he was. But I disliked it from the start. The afterwards, from Asimov’s autobiography was a bit better, but that might just be because of my aversion to the Introduction.

What really surprised me, in a good way, was the two guest stories that were excellently done. I was expecting some hackneyed writing that was riding on the coat tails. Instead, I got two stories that I thought were worthy of inclusion with the rest of the Black Widower tales. That’s a good way to end.

It has also inspired me to go read Asimov’s memoirs. I hope I have better luck with that than some of the memoirs I’ve read in the past ;-)

★★★☆☆


From Wikipedia.org

  • "Introduction" (Harlan Ellison)

  • "The Acquisitive Chuckle" (from Tales of the Black Widowers)

  • "Ph As in Phony" (from Tales of the Black Widowers)

  • "Early Sunday Morning" (from Tales of the Black Widowers)

  • "The Obvious Factor" (from Tales of the Black Widowers)

  • "The Iron Gem" (from More Tales of the Black Widowers)

  • "To the Barest" (from Casebook of the Black Widowers)

  • "Sixty Million Trillion Combinations" (from Banquets of the Black Widowers)

  • "The Wrong House" (from Banquets of the Black Widowers)

  • "The Redhead" (from Banquets of the Black Widowers)

  • "Triple Devil" (from Puzzles of the Black Widowers)

  • "The Men Who Read Isaac Asimov" (William Brittain)

  • "Northwestward" (from Magic)

  • "Yes, but Why?"

  • "Lost in a Space Warp"

  • "Police at the Door"

  • "The Haunted Cabin"

  • "The Guest's Guest"

  • "The Woman in the Bar" (from Banquets of the Black Widowers)

  • "The Last Story" (Charles Ardai)

  • "Afterword" (from I. Asimov)



Thursday, February 05, 2026

Puzzles of the Black Widowers (The Black Widowers #5) 3Stars

 

This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission

Title: Puzzles of the Black Widowers
Series: The Black Widowers #5
Authors: Isaac Asimov
Rating: 3 of 5 Stars
Genre: Mystery
Pages: 144
Words: 68K
Publish: 1990


I felt that I was being generous with giving this 3stars. Most of the stories felt like Henry (the waiter and the guy who always solves the mystery) just pulled a random solution out of a hat. Nothing that he stated was categorically fact like in previous collections. I don’t mind admitting that it might have been me, but I don’t think so. I think Asimov was reaching the end of his rope and it was showing. While the stories were written from 1985 to 1990, the collection wasn’t published until 1990 and Asimov died in ‘92.

There is one more post-humus collection of the Black Widowers. Most of the stories are reprints, but I believe there are a couple of new ones in it. I plan on focusing on those. The fact that I’m spending as much time talking about the next book as I did about this one should tell you how milque-toast this particular collection was.

★★★☆☆


From Wikipedia.org

Introduction

"The Fourth Homonym" (1985)

"Unique Is Where You Find It" (1985)

"The Lucky Piece" (1990)

"Triple Devil" (1985)

"Sunset on the Water" (1986)

"Where Is He?" (1986)

"The Old Purse" (1987)

"The Quiet Place" (1988)

"The Four-Leaf Clover" (1990)

"The Envelope" (1989)

"The Alibi" (1989)

"The Recipe" (1990)



Thursday, December 11, 2025

Banquets of the Black Widowers (The Black Widowers #4) 3Stars

 

This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission

Title: Banquets of the Black Widowers
Series: The Black Widowers #4
Authors: Isaac Asimov
Rating: 3 of 5 Stars
Genre: Mystery
Pages: 153
Words: 72K
Publish: 1984


Asimov shakes things up, just a little, by having the club members either break rules or do something completely out of the ordinary here. Not for every story, but enough. It would be like if Rex Stout had his character Nero Wolfe actually leave his house (which while Wolfe states that he won’t leave his house, his actions give the lie to that more often than not, sigh). It shook things up as the routine was broken and that was a good thing. The bickering and outright fighting amongst the members is really getting on my nerves. I’ve got one more book of these to read and then I’ll have finished the series.

I think my favorite story this time around was “The Driver” about a bunch of egghead scientists and a SETI convention and some low IQ driver getting killed. Turns out the driver was pretending and he was a Soviet spy and he let slip one bit of info that would have given him away, so his Soviet Masters had him done away with. It might have been a Cold War, but nobody was phutzing around, that was for sure.

Several of the other stories all revolve around human nature, as Asimov perceived it. I don’t see eye to eye with him on that issue all the time so those stories fell really flat for me. They also irritated me because they involved people being really stupid and even when I think that people ARE stupid, doesn’t mean I want to read about it. I mean, you like being healthy right? So do you want to read stories about weeping, suppurating boils and sores, oozing pus? Yeah, me neither.

★★★☆☆


From Wikipedia.org

"Introduction"

  • "Sixty Million Trillion Combinations" (Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, 5 May 1980) – A paranoid mathematician who suspects that his work on Goldbach's conjecture has been stolen. When the authorities demand his cooperation, he sulkily gives a clue to the code which protects his work on a shared computer, suspecting that no one could possibly guess or deduce the code. Fortunately for the agencies who need this information, the Black Widowers are able to come up with the code, purely because one member shares a trait with the mathematician.

  • "The Woman in the Bar" (Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, 30 June 1980) – the Black Widowers have as their dinner guest Darius Just, the main character from Asimov's mystery novel Murder at the ABA. Darius finds himself in danger of violent reprisals when he tries to help a frightened woman (he knows she is frightened, but he can have no idea by whom or why). She has given him crucial nonverbal communication clues which the Black Widowers solve. Asimov states that he "thought up" this Black Widowers story just for this character.[4]

  • "The Driver" – the Black Widowers consider the mysterious death of a chauffeur at a SETI Institute conference.

  • "The Good Samaritan" (Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, 10 September 1980) – in a controversial break with tradition, a woman is invited to attend the men-only club.

  • "The Year of the Action" (Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, 1 January 1981) – a historical clue is solved about a comic opera, "The Pirates of Penzance," by Gilbert and Sullivan.

  • "Can You Prove It?" (Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, 17 June 1981) – the guest describes his arrest and interrogation behind the Iron Curtain and is unable to explain why he was released.

  • "The Phoenician Bauble" (Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, May 1982) – a valuable archaeological artefact has been lost.

  • "A Monday in April" (Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, May 1983) – concerns a matter of trivia about ancient Rome. The evenings guest feels that his girlfriend cheated in a competition, but Henry's solution casts doubt on that presumption.

  • "Neither Brute Nor Human" (Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, April 1984) – the story requires solving a riddle about a poem by Edgar Allan Poe.

  • "The Redhead" (Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, October 1984) – a woman disappears into thin air.

  • "The Wrong House" – the guest is unable to determine which of his neighbours has been counterfeiting money after witnessing their operation while drunk.

  • "The Intrusion" – an uninvited guest crashes the party and asks the Black Widowers for help in finding the man who took advantage of his developmentally challenged sister.



Wednesday, July 09, 2025

Casebook of the Black Widowers (The Black Widowers #3) 3Stars

 

This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission

Title: Casebook of the Black Widowers
Series: The Black Widowers #3
Authors: Isaac Asimov
Rating: 3 of 5 Stars
Genre: Mystery
Pages: 161
Words: 75K
Publish: 1980


Another enjoyable set of short stories. The secrets and mysteries involved here were much less “intense” than in previous books, just a step up from cozy in my opinion and I enjoyed the more laid back feeling.

Onward!

★★★☆☆


From Wikipedia.org

Every month, the Black Widowers convene for sumptuous food, fine wine, and a cosmically baffling mystery. Attended by Henry, the all-knowing waiter, these gentle rogues ponder such imponderables as: * the one-syllable middle name that represents what every schoolboy knows, yet doesn't... * a murder by solar eclipse very far out in space... * a Soviet spy's dying message utilizing a Scrabble set and a newspaper sports page... * a satanic cult leader's Martian connection... * a computer criminal's strange equation of Christmas and Halloween... * an ancient symbol that provides the key to a woman's mysterious disappearance...

Contents:

* The Cross of Lorraine
* The Family Man
* The Sports Page
* Second Best
* The Missing Item
* The Next Day
* Irrelevance!
* None So Blind
* The Backward Look
* What Time Is It?
* Middle Name
* To the Barest



Saturday, May 10, 2025

More Tales of the Black Widowers (The Black Widowers #2) 3Stars

 

This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission

Title: More Tales of the Black Widowers
Series: The Black Widowers #2
Authors: Isaac Asimov
Rating: 3 of 5 Stars
Genre: Mystery
Pages: 197
Words: 77K
Publish: 1976


This was exactly more of the same from Tales of the Black Widowers. I am ok with that. I love short story collections and Asimov was master of that craft. Having him switch from Science Fiction to Mystery hasn’t changed anything in his story telling ability. Thankfully.

I probably would have bumped this up half a star since I enjoyed the stories just as much as before, but once again, the interpersonal interactions between the members of the Black Widowers Club just grated on my nerves. They are jerks to each other, they are jerks to the invited guest and I can only imagine what they must be like out in the world at large. I find it very unpleasant. Reading these Tales is like having some of that sweet and sour sauce and I’m not a fan of the sour.

This cover is very well done, in that it contrasts with the first cover (which was solid white, with one black widow spider). I like little flourishes like that. It doesn’t actually make the stories themselves any better or worse, but it adds to the overall “insert pretentious french phrase about making things better in small ways”. There, now that you haven’t learned anything at Bookstoogiversity, class is dismissed!

ps,
Thanks to Scuffed Granny, I am experimenting with the "Excerpt" part of blogging. You shouldn't notice anything different unless you read my posts in the WP Reader OR get the email for each post. To you email people, let me know what you think. 

★★★☆☆


From Wikipedia.org

This book is the second of six that describe mysteries solved by the Black Widowers, based on a literary dining club Asimov belonged to known as the Trap Door Spiders. It collects twelve stories by Asimov, nine reprinted from mystery or science fiction magazines and three previously unpublished, together with a general introduction, and an afterword following each story by the author. Each story involves the club members' knowledge of trivia.

Contents

  • "Introduction"

  • "When No Man Pursueth"

  • "Quicker Than the Eye"

  • "The Iron Gem"

  • "The Three Numbers"

  • "Nothing Like Murder"

  • "No Smoking"

  • "Season's Greetings!"

  • "The One and Only East"

  • "Earthset and Evening Star"

  • "Friday the Thirteenth"

  • "The Unabridged"

  • "The Ultimate Crime"



Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Tales of the Black Widowers (The Black Widowers #1) 3Stars

 

This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission

Title: Tales of the Black Widowers
Series: The Black Widowers #1
Authors: Isaac Asimov
Rating: 3 of 5 Stars
Genre: Mystery
Pages: 179
Words: 69K


This was a collection of short stories (as are all the books in this series) and so I knew that I would enjoy them. Asimov was an absolute master of the short story, and whether it was in SF or Mystery (as in here), he knew how to convey the most info in the shortest amount of words and STILL knock your lights out with a hidden right hook to the jaw.

So you would think this would have had a higher rating. I did too. And it would have, except for one thing, that was consistent across all the stories. The members of the club are petty and argue about the stupidest little thing, and generally made me wonder WHY they were all in the same club. They did not seem to hate each other, but they also didn’t seem to click with each other like friends do. If this was my introduction to friendship, I would want no part of it.

Without that aspect, the stories and mini-mysteries would have gotten an easy 4stars from me. Quick and punchy and never overstaying it’s welcome. Asimov also talks about each story, where it was published and something interesting about it. But! And this is most important, he does it AFTER the story is done. I get to read the story, make up my own mind about it and then he throws his own light on it. I’ve read too many anthologies where the editor thought their words and ideas were the most important and put them before the story, thus ruining the whole thing for me. Asimov was smart enough to know that The Stories the Thing. Because of that, I was able to enjoy what he wrote about them. Most of the stuff he talked about was title changes. The mystery magazine would change the title and he’d talk about why he agreed or didn’t with that decision. It also led to talking about whether he kept the title change for the story in his own book or used the original. It was all done with a very light hand and there wasn’t a note of bitterness or acrimony in it all.

I am looking forward to the rest of the series but am hoping the members become less pigheaded to each other.

★★★☆☆


From Wikipedia.org

This book is the first of six that describe mysteries solved by the Black Widowers, based on a literary dining club Asimov belonged to known as the Trap Door Spiders. It collects twelve stories by Asimov, nine reprinted from mystery magazines and three previously unpublished, together with a general introduction, and an afterword following each story by the author. Each story involves the club members' knowledge of trivia.


  • "The Acquisitive Chuckle"

  • "Ph as in Phony"

  • "Truth to Tell"

  • "Go, Little Book!"

  • "Early Sunday Morning"

  • "The Obvious Factor"

  • "The Pointing Finger"

  • "Miss What?"

  • "The Lullaby of Broadway"

  • "Yankee Doodle Went to Town"

  • "The Curious Omission"

  • "Out of Sight"



Saturday, January 27, 2024

Second Foundation (Foundation #3) 5Stars

This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission

Title: Second Foundation
Series: Foundation #3
Author: Isaac Asimov
Rating: 5 of 5 Stars
Genre: SF
Pages: 200
Words: 72K


What a masterpiece of storytelling. The Foundation Trilogy absolutely deserves all the plaudits it has received over the decades. When I read this trilogy in ‘08 and only gave it 3stars, I suspect most of that had to do with the fact that I was in the midst of thralldom to the Sandersonization of the SFF genre. Now I’m not and so can appreciate it better. Which in turns means that those who are addicted to the chunksters of SFF today probably won’t enjoy the Foundation either. That’s too bad, but that’s how it all shakes out.

Structure-wise, Second Foundation follows the same formula of the previous book, in having two novellas comprising the one book. Each novella in turn is broken down into “chapters” that read much more like a short story than just a chapter from a whole. That kind of structure works very well for me and as Asimov was a genius in terms of writing short stories, I think it works well for how the book is made up.

Story-wise, this wraps things up just fine. The First Foundation is still alive and working on it’s destiny to unite the galaxy in a second empire in a couple of hundred years and the Second Foundation is safely in the background, guiding things along. Seldon’s Plan is back on track after the disruption of The Mule and humanity seems to be riding the right track.

And I can see why people keep reading the later Foundation novels. I ended this and my first thought was “I want more”. I read Foundation’s Edge and Foundation and Earth back in highschool and hated them. But that was almost 30 years ago now and I wonder if my tastes and opinions have changed enough that I wouldn’t hate them this time around. Considering how much I loved this trilogy this time round, I am hesitant to do anything to mar that pleasure. But at the same time, I am a reader. I read books, lots and lots of books (say that in your best Neo voice please)

(But this is not a post about my decision making skills or abilities. That’s for another time. That’s a threat, count on it!)

I enjoyed reading this book, and this trilogy and I found it tantalizing, well done and once again, worthy of all the praise it has received over the years. I highly recommend this, even if you end up not liking it nearly as much as I do. The Foundation Trilogy is foundational to SF and once you’ve read it, you’ll see it peeping out everywhere in the SF genre.

★★★★★


From Wikipedia.org

Click to Open for Synopsis

Part I: Search By the Mule

Part I is about the Mule’s search for the elusive Second Foundation, with the intent of destroying it. The executive council of the Second Foundation is aware of The Mule’s intent and, in the words of the First Speaker, allows him to find it—”in a sense”. The Mule sends two of his people on a search for the Second Foundation: Han Pritcher, who had once been a captain and a member of the underground opposition prior to being Converted to the Mule’s service, and Bail Channis, an “Unconverted” man (one who hasn’t been emotionally manipulated by the Mule to join him) who has quickly risen through the ranks and impressed the Mule.

Channis reveals his suspicions about the Second Foundation being located on the planet Tazenda, and takes the ship there. They first land on Rossem, a barren planet controlled by Tazenda, and meet with its governor, who appears ordinary. Once they return to the ship, Pritcher confronts Channis and believes him to have been too successful with the search. The Mule, who had placed a hyper-relay on their ship in order to trace them through hyper-space, appears, and reveals that Channis is a Second Foundationer. Pritcher’s emotional bonds to the Mule are broken in the ensuing exchange between Channis and the Mule, and he is made to fall into deep sleep. With only the two of them left, the Mule reveals that he has brought his ships to Tazenda and has already destroyed the planet, and yet senses that Channis’s dismay is only pretense. He forces Channis to reveal that Rossem is actually the Second Foundation, and that Tazenda is only a figurehead.

The First Speaker for the Second Foundation appears and reveals to the Mule that his rule is over; neither Tazenda nor Rossem is the Second Foundation, and Channis’s knowledge had been falsely implanted to mislead the Mule. Second Foundation agents are headed to Kalgan and the Foundation worlds to undo the Conversions of the Mule, and his fleet is too far away to prevent it. When the Mule experiences a moment of despair, the First Speaker is able to seize control of and change his mind; he will return to Kalgan and live out the rest of his short life as a peaceful despot.

Part II: Search By the Foundation

Part II takes place 60 years after the first part, 55 years after the Mule’s death by natural causes. With the Mule gone his former empire falls apart and the Foundation resumes its independence. Because of their enslavement at the hands of the Mule and their wariness of the Second Foundation (who possess similar abilities to the Mule) the Foundation began studying the mental sciences.

A secret cabal is formed within the Foundation to root out the Second Foundation after evidence of the latter’s manipulation is found through mental analysis of the former society’s key figures. They send one of their own, Homir Munn, to Kalgan to search for clues to the Second Foundation’s location. Munn is followed to Kalgan by Arcadia, Dr Darell’s daughter.

Since the death of the Mule, the Second Foundation has worked to restore the Seldon Plan into its proper course. In the organization’s secret location, the First Speaker discusses the state of the galaxy with a student. The Student is concerned that the Foundation’s now tangible knowledge of the Second Foundation’s existence would have negative effects upon the former which would then further destabilize the Seldon Plan. The First Speaker reassures the Student that a plan has been put in place by their organization in order to address his very concerns.

In Kalgan, a man named Stettin has assumed the Mule’s former title as First Citizen. He believes that the Mule’s actions have made the Seldon Plan irrelevant and declares war upon the Foundation, intending to usurp their role in the formation of the Second Empire. He’s unconcerned with the possible intervention of the Second Foundation.

Arcadia escapes from Kalgan to Trantor with the help of a Trantorian trader named Preem Palver. With his help, she passes information to her father regarding the location of the Second Foundation.

Kalgan eventually loses the war against the Foundation as the specter of the Seldon Plan adversely affects the performance of the Kalganians every bit as much as it bolsters the morale of the Foundationers.

The Foundation cabal reconvenes to discuss what they’ve learned about the Second Foundation. Munn believes that the Second Foundation never existed while Pelleas Anthor believes they’re in Kalgan. Dr Darell states that the Second Foundation is in Terminus itself based on information supplied by Arcadia. He also reveals he has created a device capable of emitting mind static, which is harmful to individuals with mental abilities similar to that of the Mule and the Second Foundation. Activating the device in the presence of the cabal reveals Anthor to be a Second Foundationer, and further interrogation leads to the discovery of the rest of his comrades who are subsequently detained indefinitely.

Unsatisfied with the ease by which the Second Foundation has been defeated and suspecting Arcadia’s information to be planted through mental tampering, Dr Darell runs tests on his daughter to determine if she has been compromised. Both are relieved when the tests’ results are negative. Dr Darell basks in the realization that with the Second Foundation gone, the Foundation are the sole inheritors of the Seldon Plan and the Second Empire.

It is then revealed that the Second Foundation are not only intact but also the mastermind behind the recent major events. The Foundation’s conflict with Kalgan and their subsequent victory was meant to restore the former’s self-esteem after the Mule enslaved them. Anthor and his comrades were in fact martyrs meant to mislead the Foundation into believing they had eliminated the Second Foundation, thereby shrouding the Second Foundation in secrecy once more and restoring the Seldon Plan to its proper course. Arcadia was unknowingly working for the Second Foundation, having been mentally adjusted shortly after her birth in order to prevent detection. The Second Foundation is actually located at the planet Trantor, the seat of the previous Galactic Empire.

The story closes with the revelation that the First Speaker of the Second Foundation is Preem Palver, who is satisfied that the galaxy is now forever secure.

I, Asimov (Asimovian Memoirs #3) 5Stars

  This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards...